<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Antivirus for Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertdyson.com/2008/12/02/antivirus-for-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertdyson.com/2008/12/02/antivirus-for-mac/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://robertdyson.com/2008/12/02/antivirus-for-mac/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertdyson.com/?p=68#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Ha ha...Mac pulled the article. 

http://gizmodo.com/5101266/apple-removes-antivirus-support-note-reiterates-os-xs-built+in-protection

I do however think that they simplify it a little too much though. There&#039;s more than just the inherent security of the OS that keeps it out of scope for hackers. It is a big factor, but not the only one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha&#8230;Mac pulled the article. </p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5101266/apple-removes-antivirus-support-note-reiterates-os-xs-built+in-protection" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5101266/apple-removes-antivirus-support-note-reiterates-os-xs-built+in-protection</a></p>
<p>I do however think that they simplify it a little too much though. There&#8217;s more than just the inherent security of the OS that keeps it out of scope for hackers. It is a big factor, but not the only one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
